Recognizing the strong regional interests and loyalties which have played so great a role in American history, proponents argue that the Electoral College system contributes to the cohesiveness of the country be requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president, without such a mechanism, they point out, president would be selected either through the domination of one populous region over the others or through the domination of large metropolitan areas over the rural ones.
Another criticism of the electoral college is that it negatively affects the campaign process. The voters see only the names of the candidates for president and vice president. By dividing the population by electoral votes, we can see that Wyoming has one "elector" for everypeople and Texas has one "elector" for about everyFinally, some opponents of the Electoral College point out, quite correctly, its failure to accurately reflect the national popular will in at least two respects.
This is true even when everyone votes and there are only two candidates. The only tie in Electoral College history was ina totally bizarre situation, in the days before formal tickets, and back in the days when several states still did not even hold a popular vote in the presidential selection process.
In every state but Maine and Nebraska, electors are awarded on a winner-take-all basis. The fact that the Electoral College was originally designed to solve one set of problems but today serves to solve an entirely different set of problems is a tribute to the genius of the Founding Fathers.
Scholars call this the "faithless elector" problem. Although an elector could, in principle, change his or her vote and a few actually have over the yearsdoing so is rare.
Despite complaints, it would take an amendment to the U. Rather, the founders believed that a selected group of electors should pick the president. If the amount of Electoral College votes a state receives was directly proportionate to its population, smaller rural states would be rendered completely irrelevant.
Indeed, there may even be an incentive to discourage participation and they often cite the South here so as to enable a minority of citizens to decide the electoral vote for the whole State.
MinnPost illustration by Jaime Anderson One in a series of articles. If a candidate wins the popular vote of a state by a just a single vote, he generally receives all the electoral votes of that state excluding Maine and Nebraska. Indeed, if we become obsessed with government by popular majority as the only consideration, should we not then abolish the Senate which represents States regardless of population?
One way or another, then, the winning candidate must demonstrate both a sufficient popular support to govern as well as a sufficient distribution of that support to govern.
Bush was a Texan.But since there have been no serious proposals to abolish the United States Senate on these grounds, why should such an argument be used to abolish the lesser case of the Electoral College? Because the presidency represents the whole country?
The debate over the continued use of the Electoral College resurfaced during the presidential election, when Donald Trump lost the general election to Hillary Clinton by over million votes and won the Electoral College by 74 votes.
The official general election results indicate that Trump. Nov 16, · The Electoral College Is Important Because It Reflects the Will of the States.
Charles Fried AM.
We have a direct democracy: Senators, representatives and members of the Electoral College are all elected directly by the people. They do not, however, elect the president directly. The Electoral College was created, in part, to make the states feel important in a federalist government.
If the amount of Electoral College votes a state receives was directly proportionate to its population, smaller rural states would be.
Kennedy won Electoral College votes to Nixon's votes. Next, a candidate that loses the popular vote but wins the electoral vote must turn out to be a particularly unsuccessful and unpopular president.
Otherwise, the impetus to blame the nation's woes on the Electoral College system will never materialize. We should, however, recognize that even if the Electoral College is an anachronism that has long since ceased to perform as the framers expected, it fills other functions today.Download